Observational studyPLoS medicine2023
Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis.
Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Banting memorial lecture 2025: Aligning clinical practice, policy and research.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of NHS England's Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Pilot Scheme: Evidence From Real-World Data and Patient Simulation Modelling.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme and incident multiple long-term conditions.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Prediabetes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Variation in effectiveness of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in people diagnosed with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia by age, sex, BMI, and deprivation: A matched cohort analysis of 69,801 people.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Article
- Building diabetes prevention and remission programs across Canada: learning from England.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Is the Current Lifestyle Modification Approach to Diabetes Prevention in the U.S. a Success?Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Service users' experiences of, and engagement with, a nationally implemented digital diabetes prevention programme.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Lifestyle interventions for cardiometabolic health.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Age- and deprivation-related inequalities in identification of people at high risk of type 2 diabetes in England.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Level of attendance at the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Short-Term Costs and Benefits of a Nationwide Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: Retrospective Observational Study.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Observational
- Ongoing Increase in Incidence of Diabetes in Austrian Children and Adolescents (1989-2021): Results from a Nationwide Registry.Pediatric diabetes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NDPP) is a behaviour change programme for adults who are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): people with raised blood glucose levels, but not in the diabetic range, diagnosed with nondiabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). We examined the association between referral to the programme and reducing conversion of NDH to T2DM. METHODS AND
findingsCohort study of patients attending primary care in England using clinical Practice Research Datalink data from 1 April 2016 (NDPP introduction) to 31 March 2020 was used. To minimise confounding, we matched patients referred to the programme in referring practices to patients in nonreferring practices. Patients were matched based on age (≥3 years), sex, and ≥365 days of NDH diagnosis. Random-effects parametric survival models evaluated the intervention, controlling for numerous covariates. Our primary analysis was selected a priori: complete case analysis, 1-to-1 practice matching, up to 5 controls sampled with replacement. Various sensitivity analyses were conducted, including multiple imputation approaches. Analysis was adjusted for age (at index date), sex, time from NDH diagnosis to index date, BMI, HbA1c, total serum cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prescription of metformin, smoking status, socioeconomic status, a diagnosis of depression, and comorbidities. A total of 18,470 patients referred to NDPP were matched to 51,331 patients not referred to NDPP in the main analysis. Mean follow-up from referral was 482.0 (SD = 317.3) and 472.4 (SD = 309.1) days, for referred to NDPP and not referred to NDPP, respectively. Baseline characteristics in the 2 groups were similar, except referred to NDPP were more likely to have higher BMI and be ever-smokers. The adjusted HR for referred to NDPP, compared to not referred to NDPP, was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.87) (p < 0.001). The probability of not converting to T2DM at 36 months since referral was 87.3% (95% CI: 86.5% to 88.2%) for referred to NDPP and 84.6% (95% CI: 83.9% to 85.4%) for not referred to NDPP. Associations were broadly consistent in the sensitivity analyses, but often smaller in magnitude. As this is an observational study, we cannot conclusively address causality. Other limitations include the inclusion of controls from the other 3 UK countries, data not allowing the evaluation of the association between attendance (rather than referral) and conversion.
conclusionsThe NDPP was associated with reduced conversion rates from NDH to T2DM. Although we observed smaller associations with risk reduction, compared to what has been observed in RCTs, this is unsurprising since we examined the impact of referral, rather than attendance or completion of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.