Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36848273›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2023

New Developments in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Pathophysiology and Treatment.

Brian H Cameron, Amber U Luong

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manuka Honey Sinus Irrigation Versus Systemic Itraconazole in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Randomised Clinical Trial for Efficacy and Safety.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Indoor and Outdoor Fungal Allergens and Impacts on Respiratory Allergic Disease.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring the role of candidalysin in the pathogenicity ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian H CameronDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, 12340The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-1484
Amber U LuongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, 12340The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is an endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps characterized by eosinophilic mucin laden with fungal hyphae entrapped in expanded sinus cavities with an exaggerated hypersensitivity to fungal elements. The last decade has elucidated fungi-driven inflammatory pathways contributing to the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases. In addition, novel therapeutic biologic options have become available for CRS over the last several years.

objectiveTo review the current literature examining AFRS, focusing on recent developments in our understanding of its pathophysiology and implications for treatment options.

methodsReview article.

resultsFungi-driven respiratory inflammation has been linked to fungal proteinases and toxin activity. In addition, AFRS patients demonstrate a local sinonasal immunodeficiency in antimicrobial peptides and hence limited antifungal activity, along with an exaggerated type 2 inflammatory response, highlighting a possible imbalanced type 1, type 2, and type 3 profile. The elucidation of these dysregulated molecular pathways has highlighted novel potential therapeutic targets. As such, the clinical management of AFRS, which once included surgery and extended courses of oral corticosteroids, is transitioning away from long courses of oral corticosteroids to incorporate novel delivery mechanisms of topical therapeutic targets and biologics for recalcitrant disease.

conclusionAFRS is an endotype of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) for which the molecular pathways leading to its inflammatory dysfunction are beginning to be illuminated. In addition to affecting treatment options, these understandings may shape necessary changes to diagnostic criteria and the extrapolated effects of environmental changes on AFRS. More critically, a better appreciation of fungi-driven inflammatory pathways may have implications for the understanding of broader CRS inflammation.

Indexed as

Allergic Fungal SinusitisHypersensitivityNasal PolypsParanasal SinusesHumansInflammationallergicantimicrobial peptidesbiologicscandidalysinfungalIL-13IL-17IL-4inflammationnasal polypsproteinaserhinosinusitis

Identifiers

PMID36848273
PMCPMC11898383
OpenAlexW4322491805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.