Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36848090›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Association of Central Sensitization Inventory Scores With Pain Outcomes After Endometriosis Surgery.

Natasha L Orr, Alice J Huang, Yang Doris Liu, Heather Noga, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Christina Williams, Catherine Allaire, Paul J Yong

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02911090 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort (EPPIC) Data Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBC Women's Hospital & Health CentreRan2016 to 2028Enrolled5,000ConditionsEndometriosisArmsData Registry
NCT07014761 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Influence of Central Sensitization in Endometriosis Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsEndometriosis, AdenomatosisArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The hidden burden: connective tissue, mast cell, and autoimmune comorbidities cluster in POTS with endometriosis.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese and electronic migration of the WERF EPHect endometriosis patient questionnaire.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Nociplastic Pain in Endometriosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha L OrrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alice J HuangUniversity of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Yang Doris LiuUniversity of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Heather NogaUniversity of British Columbia Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohamed A BedaiwyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christina WilliamsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Catherine AllaireDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Paul J YongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A subset of people who undergo surgery for endometriosis have persistent pain, suggesting that other factors besides the endometriosis, such as central sensitization, may play a role in this pain. The Central Sensitization Inventory, a validated self-reported questionnaire of central sensitization symptoms, may identify individuals with endometriosis who have more pain after surgery due to pain sensitization. Objective: To examine whether greater baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores are associated with postsurgical pain outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study performed at a tertiary center for endometriosis and pelvic pain in British Columbia, Canada, included all patients aged 18 to 50 years with diagnosed or suspected endometriosis and a baseline visit between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, who underwent surgery after the baseline visit. Individuals who were menopausal, had a prior hysterectomy, or were missing data for outcomes or measures were excluded. Data analysis was performed from July 2021 to June 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was chronic pelvic pain at follow-up measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 to 3 indicating no pain or mild pain, 4 to 6 indicating moderate pain, and 7 to 10 indicating severe pain. Secondary outcomes were deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and back pain at follow-up. The main variable of interest was baseline Central Sensitization Inventory score (measured from 0 to 100, consisting of 25 self-reported questions rated from 0 to 4 [never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always, respectively]). Results: A total of 239 patients (mean [SD] age, 34 [7] years; 189 [79.1%] White [11 (5.8%) identified as White mixed with another ethnicity], 1 [0.4%] Black or African American, 29 [12.1%] Asian, 2 [0.8%] Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 16 [6.7%] other, and 2 [0.8%] mixed race or ethnicity) with follow-up data at more than 4 months after surgery were included in this study (71.0% follow-up rate). The mean (SD) baseline Central Sensitization Inventory score was 43.8 (18.2), and the mean (SD) follow-up was 16.1 (6.1) months. Higher baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores were significantly associated with higher chronic pelvic pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .02), deep dyspareunia (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .004), dyschezia (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .001), and back pain (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .02) at follow-up, when controlling for baseline pain scores. The Central Sensitization Inventory scores themselves decreased slightly from baseline to follow-up (mean [SD] score, 43.8 [18.2] vs 41.7 [18.9]; P = .05); however, individuals with high baseline Central Sensitization Inventory scores still had high scores at follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 239 patients with endometriosis, higher Central Sensitization Inventory scores at baseline were associated with worse pain outcomes after endometriosis surgery, when controlling for baseline pain scores. The Central Sensitization Inventory could be used to counsel patients with endometriosis on their expected outcomes after surgery.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDyspareuniaEndometriosisAdultBritish ColumbiaCentral Nervous System SensitizationCohort StudiesConstipationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPelvic PainProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36848090
PMCPMC9972194
OpenAlexW4322492618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.