Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36848024›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023

The safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Jawza Meaadi, Ilona Obara, Sam Eldabe, Hamde Nazar

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Glaucine suppresses IL-16/CD4 to alleviate neuropathic pain via spinal p56Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Itching, Ionic Channels, Immune System, Magnesium and Antioxidants.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Review
  17. Calcium Channel αPain and therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jawza MeaadiSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Ilona ObaraSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. ilona.obara@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8906-2771
Sam EldabeDepartment of Pain and Anaesthesia, James Cook Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Hamde NazarSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Newcastle University · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBKing Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are increasing concerns regarding the abusive potential of gabapentinoids putting at risk patients with neuropathic pain requiring long-term pain management. The evidence to support this is rather inconcusive.

aimThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain with a focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and categorising the side effects according to the body systems they were affecting.

methodSearches were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycoINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO), and included RCTs to identify and critically appraise studies investigating safety and therapeutic effects of gabapentionoids in adults with neuropathic pain. Data extraction was conducted using an established Cochrane form and the risk-of-bias tool was used in the assessment of quality.

results50 studies (12,398 participants) were included. The majority of adverse events pertained to the nervous system (7 effects) or psychiatric (3 effects) disorders. There were more adverse effects reported with pregabalin (36 effects) than with gabapentin (22 effects). Six pregabalin studies reported euphoria as a side effect, while no studies reported euphoria with gabapentin. This was the only side effect that may correlate with addictive potential. Gabapentioids were reported to significantly reduce pain compared to placebo.

conclusionDespite RCTs documenting the adverse events of gabapentionoids on the nervous system, there was no evidence of gabapentinoid use leading to addiction, suggesting an urgent need to design studies investigating their abusive potential.

Indexed as

Cyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsNeuralgiaAdultAminesAnalgesicsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansPregabalinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAminesAnalgesicsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidPregabalinGabapentinMeta-analysisNeuralgiaNeuropathic painPregabalinSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36848024
PMCPMC10250255
OpenAlexW4322490154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.