ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023
Developing supervised machine learning algorithms to evaluate the therapeutic effect and laboratory-related adverse events of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplants.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Models to Optimize Tacrolimus Dosing in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Machine learning driven precision medicine in tacrolimus dosing: current research and future perspectives in liver and kidney transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Optimizing tacrolimus dosage in post-renal transplantation using DoseOptimal framework: profiling CYP3A5 genetic variants for interpretability.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Analytical modelling techniques for enhancing tacrolimus dosing in solid organ transplantation: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: a new field of knowledge for nephrologists?Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle nucleotide polymorphisms influence the effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplants.
aimWe set out to use machine learning algorithms (MLAs) to identify variables that predict the therapeutic effects and adverse events following tacrolimus and cyclosporine administration in renal transplant patients.
methodWe sampled 120 adult renal transplant patients (on cyclosporine or tacrolimus). Generalized linear model (GLM), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), Chi-square automatic interaction detection, classification and regression tree, and K-nearest neighbors were the chosen MLAs. The mean absolute error (MAE), relative mean square error (RMSE), and regression coefficient (β) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the model parameters.
resultsFor a stable dose of tacrolimus, the MAEs (RMSEs) of GLM, SVM, and ANN were 1.3 (1.5), 1.3 (1.8), and 1.7 (2.3) mg/day, respectively. GLM revealed that the POR*28 genotype and age significantly predicted the stable dose of tacrolimus as follows: POR*28 (β -1.8; 95% CI -3, -0.5; p = 0.006), and age (β -0.04; 95% CI -0.1, -0.006; p = 0.02). For a stable dose of cyclosporine, MAEs (RMSEs) of 93.2 (103.4), 79.1 (115.2), and 73.7 (91.7) mg/day were observed with GLM, SVM, and ANN, respectively. GLM revealed the following predictors of a stable dose of cyclosporine: CYP3A5*3 (β -80.8; 95% CI -130.3, -31.2; p = 0.001), and age (β -3.4; 95% CI -5.9, -0.9; p = 0.007).
conclusionWe observed that various MLAs could identify significant predictors that were useful to optimize tacrolimus and cyclosporine dosing regimens; yet, the findings must be externally validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36848022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.