Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847995›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2023

A Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Improve Adherence to ACEIs/ARBs among Nonadherent Older Adults with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes.

Anjana Mohan, Zahra Majd, Michael L Johnson, Ekere J Essien, Jamie Barner, Omar Serna, Esteban Gallardo, Marc L Fleming, Nancy Ordonez, Marcia M Holstad and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03985098 (A Motivational Interviewing Intervention Customized by Patient Adherence Patterns), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03985098 nacompletednot on this map

A Motivational Interviewing Intervention Customized by Patient Adherence Patterns

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HoustonRan2019 to 2022Enrolled727ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, HypertensionArmsMotivational interviewing intervention arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anjana Mohan *Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.
Zahra Majd *Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.
Michael L JohnsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.
Ekere J EssienDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.
Jamie BarnerHealth Outcomes Division, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Omar SernaCareAllies, Houston, TX, USA.
Esteban GallardoCareAllies, Houston, TX, USA.
Marc L FlemingPharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA, USA.
Nancy OrdonezDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Marcia M HolstadNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susan M AbughoshDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA. smabughosh@uh.edu.
University of Houston · USCARE USA · USChapman University · USEmory University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

A motivational interviewing intervention customized by patient adherence patternsR15HL135700 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI ABUGHOSH, SUSAN M · 2018 to 2018
$459k
NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL135700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension and diabetes mellitus are independent risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Due to the cardioprotective nature of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), they are recommended for patients with comorbid hypertension and diabetes. However, poor adherence to ACEIs/ARBs among older adults is a major public health concern. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a telephonic motivational interviewing (MI) intervention conducted by pharmacy students among a nonadherent older population (≥ 65 years old) with diabetes and hypertension.

methodsPatients continuously enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan who received an ACEI/ARB prescription between July 2017 and December 2017 were identified. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was used to identify distinct patterns of ACEI/ARB adherence during the 1-year baseline period: adherent, gaps in adherence, gradual decline, and rapid decline in adherence. Patients from the three nonadherent trajectories were randomized into MI intervention or control group. The intervention consisted of an initial call and five follow-up calls administered by MI-trained pharmacy students and tailored to the baseline ACEI/ARB adherence trajectories. The primary outcome was adherence to ACEI/ARB during the 6- and 12-month periods post-MI implementation. The secondary outcome was discontinuation, defined as no refills for ACEI/ARB during the 6- and 12-month periods post-MI implementation. Multivariable regression analyses examined the impact of MI intervention on ACEI/ARB adherence and discontinuation while adjusting for baseline covariates.

resultsA total of 240 patients in the intervention group and 480 patients as randomly selected controls were included in this study. At 6 months, patients receiving the MI intervention had significantly better adherence (β = 0.06; p = 0.03) compared with the controls. Linear and logistic regression models also showed patients in the intervention group were more likely to be adherent than controls within 12 months of intervention implementation (β = 0.06; p = 0.02 and OR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.04, respectively). MI intervention did not have any significant impact on the ACEI/ARB discontinuation.

conclusionPatients who received the MI intervention were more likely to be adherent at 6 and 12 months following the intervention initiation, despite gaps in the follow-up calls due to COVID-19. Pharmacist-led MI intervention is an effective behavioral strategy to improve medication adherence among older adults and tailoring the intervention to past adherence patterns may enhance the intervention effectiveness. This study was registered with the United States National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03985098).

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusHypertensionMedicare Part CMotivational InterviewingAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHumansRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID36847995
PMCPMC9969383
OpenAlexW4322494118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.