Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847978›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2023

A multicenter prospective study of next-generation sequencing-based newborn screening for monogenic genetic diseases in China.

Ru-Lai Yang, Gu-Ling Qian, Ding-Wen Wu, Jing-Kun Miao, Xue Yang, Ben-Qing Wu, Ya-Qiong Yan, Hai-Bo Li, Xin-Mei Mao, Jun He and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Progress and Prospects of Newborn Screening in China.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  17. [Genetic screening and follow-up results in 3 001 newborns in the Yunnan region].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ru-Lai YangNational Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Gu-Ling QianNational Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ding-Wen WuNational Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jing-Kun MiaoChongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Neonatal Screening Center, Chongqing, China.
Xue YangGuiyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Ben-Qing WuUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China.
Ya-Qiong YanShanxi Children's Hospital Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Hai-Bo LiThe Central Laboratory of Birth Defects Prevention and Control, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, 315012, Zhejiang, China.
Xin-Mei MaoMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China.
Jun HeChangsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Huan ShenYunnan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Kunming, Yunan, China.
Hui ZouJinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shu-Yuan XueUrumqi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi City, China.
Xiao-Ze LiMedical Genetic Center, Changzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi, China.
Ting-Ting NiuMaternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Rui XiaoNational Engineering Laboratory for Key Technology of Birth Defect Control and Prevention, Screening and Diagnostic R and D Center, Hangzhou, China.
Zheng-Yan ZhaoNational Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. zhaozy@zju.edu.cn.
Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNChangsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care · CNChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNShanxi Provincial Children's Hospital · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region · CNYunnan Maternal and Child Health · CN

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Anhui Province No. 2021C03099National Key R&D Program of China of Research on Application Demonstration and Evaluation of Comprehensive Prevention And Control Technology of Birth Defects No. 2018YFC1002700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening (NBS) is an important and successful public health program that helps improve the long-term clinical outcomes of newborns by providing early diagnosis and treatment of certain inborn diseases. The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology provides new opportunities to expand current newborn screening methodologies.

methodsWe designed a a newborn genetic screening (NBGS) panel targeting 135 genes associated with 75 inborn disorders by multiplex PCR combined with NGS. With this panel, a large-scale, multicenter, prospective multidisease analysis was conducted on dried blood spot (DBS) profiles from 21,442 neonates nationwide.

resultsWe presented the positive detection rate and carrier frequency of diseases and related variants in different regions; and 168 (0.78%) positive cases were detected. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDD) and phenylketonuria (PKU) had higher prevalence rates, which were significantly different in different regions. The positive detection of G6PD variants was quite common in south China, whereas PAH variants were most commonly identified in north China. In addition, NBGS identified 3 cases with DUOX2 variants and one with SLC25A13 variants, which were normal in conventional NBS, but were confirmed later as abnormal in repeated biochemical testing after recall. Eighty percent of high-frequency gene carriers and 60% of high-frequency variant carriers had obvious regional differences. On the premise that there was no significant difference in birth weight and gestational age, the biochemical indicators of SLC22A5 c.1400C > G and ACADSB c.1165A > G carriers were significantly different from those of non-carriers.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that NBGS is an effective strategy to identify neonates affected with treatable diseases as a supplement to current NBS methods. Our data also showed that the prevalence of diseases has significant regional characteristics, which provides a theoretical basis for screening diseases in different regions.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningPhenylketonuriasGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfant, NewbornMitochondrial Membrane Transport ProteinsProspective StudiesSolute Carrier Family 22 Member 5Mitochondrial Membrane Transport ProteinsSLC22A5 protein, humanSLC25A13 protein, humanSolute Carrier Family 22 Member 5Monogenic genetic diseasesNewborn screeningNext-generation sequencingRegional features

Identifiers

PMID36847978
PMCPMC10258179
OpenAlexW4322496595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.