Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847929›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2023

Treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: recent developments and future perspectives.

Ioannis Sagonas, Dimitrios Daoussis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis SagonasRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-3813
Dimitrios DaoussisDepartment of Rheumatology, Patras University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece. jimdaoussis@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-3655
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DEUniversity of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital ulcers (DUs) comprise the main manifestation of vasculopathy and are a major cause of disability in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). A literature search in Web of Science, PubMed and Directory of Open Access Journals was performed in December 2022 to identify articles published in the last decade regarding the management of DUs. Prostacyclin analogues, endothelin antagonists and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors have shown promising results both as a stand-alone treatment and in combination for the treatment of existing and prevention of new DUs. Moreover, autologous fat grafting and botulinum toxin injections, although not readily available, can be of use in recalcitrant cases. Many investigational treatments with promising results could pave the way for a paradigm shift in the treatment of DUs in the future. Despite these recent advances, challenges remain. Better-designed trials are of paramount importance to optimise DU treatment in the years to come. Key Points • DUs are a major cause of pain and reduced quality of life in patients with SSc. • Prostacyclin analogues and endothelin antagonists have shown promising results both as a stand-alone treatment and in combination for the treatment of existing and prevention of new DUs. • In the future, a combination of more powerful vasodilatory drugs, perhaps in conjunction with topical approaches, may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, SystemicSkin UlcerEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsFingersHumansProstaglandins IQuality of LifeEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsProstaglandins IDigital ulcersSclerodermaSystemic sclerosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36847929
PMCPMC10497679
OpenAlexW4322494895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.