ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Using acoustic feedback and analyses for removal of bone cement during revision knee replacement surgeries.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the scraping sounds generated during revision knee replacement surgeries to discriminate between the inner cortical bone and the cement, with the goal of minimizing bone removal and increasing the structural integrity of the revision.
methodsWe prepared seven porcine femurs by partially filling them with bone cement, and recorded scraping sounds produced by a surgical scraping tool. We used a hierarchical machine learning approach to first detect a contact and then classify it as either bone or cement. This approach was based on a Support Vector Machine learning algorithm that was fed with temporal and spectral features of the sounds. A Leave-One-Bone-Out validation method was used to assess the performance of the proposed method.
resultsThe average recall for the noncontact, bone, and cement classes was 98%, 75%, and 72%, respectively. The corresponding precision for the respective classes was 99%, 67%, and 61%.
conclusionThe scraping sound that is generated during revision replacement surgeries carries significant information about the material that is being scraped. Such information can be extracted using a supervised machine learning algorithm. The scraping sound produced during revision replacement procedures can potentially be used to enhance cement removal during knee revision surgery. Future work will assess whether such monitoring can increase the structural integrity of the revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36847903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.