Observational studyJournal of neurology2023
Deep phenotyping of frontal lobe epilepsy compared to other epilepsy syndromes.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsFrontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) is understudied and often misdiagnosed. We sought to comprehensively phenotype FLE and to differentiate FLE from other focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes.
methodsThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1078 cases of confirmed epilepsy in a tertiary neurology centre in London. Data sources were electronic health records, investigation reports and clinical letters.
results166 patients had FLE based on clinical findings and investigations-97 with identifiable electroencephalography (EEG) foci in frontal areas (definite FLE), while 69 had no frontal EEG foci (probable FLE). Apart from EEG findings, probable and definite FLE did not differ in other features. FLE was distinct from generalized epilepsy, which tended to present with tonic-clonic seizures and be due to genetic causes. FLE and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) both featured focal unaware seizures and underlying structural or metabolic aetiology. FLE, TLE and generalized epilepsy differed in their EEG (P = 0.0003) and MRI (P = 0.002) findings, where FLE had a higher rate of normal EEG and abnormal MRI findings compared to TLE.
conclusionsEEG is often normal for FLE, and abnormalities are commonly identified with MRI. There was no difference in the clinical features of definite and probable FLE, suggesting they represent the same clinical entity. The diagnosis of FLE can be made even when scalp EEG is normal. This large medical cohort provides hallmark features of FLE that differentiate it from TLE and other epilepsy syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.