Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847841›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023

Optimization of InnoXtract™ extraction and purification system for DNA extraction from skeletal samples.

Jennifer Snedeker, Sheree Hughes, Rachel Houston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer SnedekerDepartment of Forensic Science, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, 1003 Bowers Blvd., TX, 77341, Huntsville, USA. jls191@shsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-5384
Sheree HughesDepartment of Forensic Science, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, 1003 Bowers Blvd., TX, 77341, Huntsville, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-4605
Rachel HoustonDepartment of Forensic Science, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, 1003 Bowers Blvd., TX, 77341, Huntsville, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9833-6837

Funding

National Science Foundation 1739805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The InnoXtract™ extraction and purification system is a purification method designed for DNA extraction from low-template samples, specifically rootless hair shafts. Its ability to successfully capture highly fragmented DNA suggests its suitability for use with other challenging sample types, including skeletal remains. However, the lysis and digestion parameters required modifications to successfully optimize the method for this sample type. A two-part digestion was developed utilizing a homebrew digestion buffer (0.5 M EDTA, 0.05% Tween 20, and 100 mM NaCl) and a supplemental lysis with the Hair Digestion Buffer included in the InnoXtract™ kit. Additionally, the magnetic bead volume was modified to improve DNA recovery from these challenging samples. With the altered protocol, the quality and quantity of DNA recovered from InnoXtract™ extracts were comparable to another commercial skeletal extraction method (PrepFiler™ BTA). This modified extraction method successfully purified sufficient amounts of quality DNA from a variety of skeletal samples to produce complete STR profiles. Successful STR typing from surface decomposition, burned, cremated, buried, and embalmed remains indicates the potential of this new method for challenging human identification and missing-person cases.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesDNA FingerprintingBody RemainsDNAHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsDNADNA extractionForensic sciencesHuman identification (HID)InnoXtract™Short tandem repeats (STR)Skeletal remains

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.