Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847838›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany.

I B Runnebaum, A Kather, J Vorwergk, J J Cruz, A R Mothes, C R Beteta, J Boer, M Keller, M Pölcher, A Mustea and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Complications Following Bilateral Salpingectomy by Indication: Population-Based Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

I B RunnebaumDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. direktion-gyn@med.uni-jena.de.
A KatherDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
J VorwergkDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
J J CruzDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
A R MothesDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
C R BetetaDepartment of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
J BoerNord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynaekologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.), Schwedenstraße 9, 13359, Berlin, Germany.
M KellerNord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynaekologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.), Schwedenstraße 9, 13359, Berlin, Germany.
M PölcherDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Rotkreuzklinikum München Frauenklinik, Taxisstraße 3, 80637, München, Germany.
A MusteaGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
J SehouliDepartment of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEJena University Hospital · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany.

methods(1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005-2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis).

results(1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years.

conclusionMounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.

Indexed as

GynecologyOvarian NeoplasmsAdultCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPregnancySalpingectomyCancer preventionCase number analysisDefinitive contraceptionFallopian tubesHysterectomyOpinionOpportunistic salpingectomyTubal sterilization

Identifiers

PMID36847838
PMCPMC10374707
OpenAlexW4322496720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.