Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847752›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2023

Waiting more than 24 hours for hip fracture surgery is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes for sicker patients: a nationwide cohort study of 63,998 patients using the Swedish Hip Fracture Register.

Katarina Greve, Stina Ek, Erzsébet Bartha, Karin Modig, Margareta Hedström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Hip fracture surgery within 24 hours: no association between time to surgery and mortality in a real-world cohort.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katarina GreveDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care (PMI), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm. katarina.greve@ki.se.
Stina EkInstitute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Erzsébet BarthaDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care (PMI), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm.
Karin ModigInstitute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Margareta HedströmDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Trauma and Reparative Medicine Theme (TRM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWaiting time to surgery is a modifiable risk factor in hip fracture surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the acceptable duration of waiting time. We used the Swedish Hip Fracture Register RIKSHÖFT and 3 administrative registers to explore the association between time to surgery and adverse outcomes after discharge. PATIENTS AND

methods63,998 patients ≥ 65 years, admitted to a hospital between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2017 were included. Time to surgery was divided into < 12, 12-24, and > 24 hours. Diagnoses investigated were atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, and "acute ischemia" (a combination of stroke/intracranial bleeding, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury). Crude and adjusted survival analyses were performed. Time spent in hospital following the initial hospitalization was described for the 3 groups.

resultsWaiting > 24 hours was associated with an increased risk of AF (HR 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.6), CHF (HR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.4) and "acute ischemia" (HR 1.2, CI 1.01-1.3). However, stratifying for ASA grade revealed that these associations were present only in patients with ASA 3-4. There was no association between waiting time and pneumonia after the initial hospitalization (HR 1.1, CI 0.97-1.2), but one was found with pneumonia during hospital stay OR 1.2 (CI 1.1-1.4). Time in hospital after the initial hospitalization was similar over the waiting time groups.

conclusionThe associations between waiting > 24 hours for hip fracture surgery and AF, CHF, and acute ischemia suggest that shorter waiting time may reduce adverse outcomes for the sicker patients.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesCohort StudiesHospitalizationHospitalsHumansSweden

Identifiers

PMID36847752
PMCPMC9972166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.