ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023
Does thoracoscopic basal pyramid segmentectomy really offer functional advantages in comparison with thoracoscopic lower lobectomy?
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basilar segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: is it worth preserving the S6 segment?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Learning curve for double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lung segmentectomy: a propensity score matching study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- What is the benefit of preserving the superior segment in anatomical thoracoscopic resections of the lower lobe?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Lung Segmentectomy in NSCLC Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe functional impact of thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy in comparison with lower lobectomy has not been investigated in-depth and the aim of this study was to clarify this topic.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed a cohort of patients who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 for non-small-cell lung cancer, peripherally located lung nodules, far enough from both the apical segment and the lobar hilum to allow an oncologically safe thoracoscopic lower lobectomy or basal segmentectomy. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including spirometry and plethysmography were performed 1 month after surgery and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were collected; the difference, the loss and the recovery rate of pulmonary function were calculated and compared with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
resultsDuring the study period, n = 45 and n = 16 patients for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lower lobectomy and for VATS basal segmentectomy, respectively, completed the study protocol: the 2 groups were homogeneous as to preoperative variables and PFT values. Postoperative outcomes were similar and PFTs revealed significant differences between postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s %, FVC%, ΔFVC and ΔFVC%. The loss percentage of FVC%, DLCO% and the recovery rate was better for FVC and DLCO in the VATS basal segmentectomy group.
conclusionsThoracoscopic basal segmentectomy seems to be associated with a more preserved lung function, maintaining more FVC and DLCO levels than lower lobectomy, and could be performed in selected cases ensuring also adequate oncological margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.