Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847633›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

Efficacy of kinesio taping on upper limb volume reduction in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Nicola Marotta, Lorenzo Lippi, Valerio Ammendolia, Dario Calafiore, Maria T Inzitari, Monica Pinto, Marco Invernizzi, Alessandro de Sire

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Technical aspects and validation of custom digital algorithms for hand volumetry.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola MarottaUnit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Lorenzo LippiUnit of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Valerio AmmendoliaUnit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Dario CalafioreUnit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurosciences, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantua, Italy.
Maria T InzitariUnit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Monica PintoUnit of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Strategic Health Services, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori - G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy.
Marco InvernizziUnit of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Alessandro de SireUnit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy - alessandro.desire@unicz.it.
Magna Graecia University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the most common disabling complications in breast cancer (BC) patients is breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), a pathological condition affecting both physical and psychological function, with detrimental consequences on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Rehabilitation has a key role in the comprehensive management of this condition with several studies reporting positive results after performing complex decongestive therapies (CDT) in these women. Kinesio taping (KT) is a rather recent therapeutic approach to treat BCRL, however, evidence in literature regarding its effectiveness is far from being fully characterized. Therefore, this systematic review aimed at assessing the role of KT among the CDT to treat BCRL. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception until May 5 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of the documents identified, 123 were eligible for data screening, and only 7 RCTs satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included. We found that KT might have a positive effect on limb volume reduction in patients with BCRL, albeit there is little evidence for low quality of the included studies.

conclusionsTaken together, this systematic review showed that KT did not significantly reduce the upper limb volume in BCRL women, albeit it seemed to increase the flow rate during the passive exercise. Further high-quality-studies are mandatory to improve the knowledge in order to include the KT might into a multidisciplinary rehabilitative approach for the management of BC survivors affected by lymphedema.

Indexed as

Athletic TapeBreast NeoplasmsLymphedemaFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID36847633
PMCPMC10167702
OpenAlexW4322495710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.