Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847299›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Modified T

Michael Alexander Chesnaye, Steven Lewis Bell, James Michael Harte, Lisbeth Birkelund Simonsen, Anisa Sadru Visram, Michael Anthony Stone, Kevin James Munro, David Martin Simpson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael Alexander Chesnaye59622Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9885-2655
Steven Lewis Bell59622Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
James Michael HarteInteracoustics Research Unit, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Lisbeth Birkelund SimonsenInteracoustics Research Unit, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Anisa Sadru VisramManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, 5292University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael Anthony StoneManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, 5292University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2252-9258
Kevin James MunroManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, 5292University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David Martin Simpson59622Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBInteracoustics (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) is a change in neural activity in response to sound, and is of interest for audiological assessment of infants, especially those who use hearing aids. Within this population, CAEP waveforms are known to vary substantially across individuals, which makes detecting the CAEP through visual inspection a challenging task. It also means that some of the best automated CAEP detection methods used in adults are probably not suitable for this population. This study therefore evaluates and optimizes the performance of new and existing methods for aided (i.e., the stimuli are presented through subjects' hearing aid(s)) CAEP detection in infants with hearing loss. Methods include the conventional Hotellings T

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing LossAcoustic StimulationAdultAudiometryEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearingHumansInfantaided CAEP detectionevoked potentialshearing-impaired infantsHotelling's T2 test

Identifiers

PMID36847299
PMCPMC9974628
OpenAlexW4322499925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.