Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847161›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2023

New advances in CRISPR/Cas-mediated precise gene-editing techniques.

Chris Richardson, Robert N Kelsh, Rebecca J Richardson

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advancing Knock-In Approaches for Robust Genome Editing in Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Homology-arm length of donor DNA affects the impact of Msh2 loss on homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Engineering Cas9: next generation of genomic editors.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris RichardsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Robert N KelshDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-0066
Rebecca J RichardsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-8713
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008741/1British Heart Foundation FS/15/2/31225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, CRISPR/Cas-based gene editing has become a powerful tool for generating mutations in a variety of model organisms, from Escherichia coli to zebrafish, rodents and large mammals. CRISPR/Cas-based gene editing effectively generates insertions or deletions (indels), which allow for rapid gene disruption. However, a large proportion of human genetic diseases are caused by single-base-pair substitutions, which result in more subtle alterations to protein function, and which require more complex and precise editing to recreate in model systems. Precise genome editing (PGE) methods, however, typically have efficiencies of less than a tenth of those that generate less-specific indels, and so there has been a great deal of effort to improve PGE efficiency. Such optimisations include optimal guide RNA and mutation-bearing donor DNA template design, modulation of DNA repair pathways that underpin how edits result from Cas-induced cuts, and the development of Cas9 fusion proteins that introduce edits via alternative mechanisms. In this Review, we provide an overview of the recent progress in optimising PGE methods and their potential for generating models of human genetic disease.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9HumansMammalsMutationZebrafishCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Base/prime editingCRISPR/CasHDRHuman disease modellingPrecise genome editing

Identifiers

PMID36847161
PMCPMC10003097
OpenAlexW4322500254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read44
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.