Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847130›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Crohn's & colitis2023

Mercaptopurine for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Mark Löwenberg, Adriaan Volkers, Sara van Gennep, Aart Mookhoek, Nahid Montazeri, Esmé Clasquin, Marjolijn Duijvestein, Adriaan van Bodegraven, Svend Rietdijk, Jeroen Jansen and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The roles and heterogeneity of CD8International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical features and current treatment approach to ulcerative proctitis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selecting first-line advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis: A clinical application of personalized medicine.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
  14. Uphill battle: Innovation of thiopurine therapy in global inflammatory bowel disease care.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 11 countries.

Mark LöwenbergDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Adriaan VolkersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9547-1627
Sara van GennepDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aart MookhoekInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nahid MontazeriBiostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esmé ClasquinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marjolijn DuijvesteinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Adriaan van BodegravenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Svend RietdijkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeroen JansenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dirk van AsseldonkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Esmerij van der ZandenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amstelland Ziekenhuis, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.
Marcel DijkgraafDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rachel WestDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Nanne de BoerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert D'HaensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLOLVG · NLBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DENoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLUniversity of Bern · CHVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLZiekenhuis Amstelland · NL

Funding

ZonMw 836041002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsScepticism about the efficacy of thiopurines for ulcerative colitis [UC] is rising. This study aimed to evaluate mercaptopurine treatment for UC.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with active UC, despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylates [5-ASA], were randomized for therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM]-guided mercaptopurine treatment or placebo for 52 weeks. Corticosteroids were given in the first 8 weeks and 5-ASA was continued. Proactive metabolite-based mercaptopurine and placebo dose adjustments were applied from week 6 onwards by unblinded clinicians. The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement [total Mayo score ≤2 points and no item >1] at week 52 in an intention-to-treat analysis.

resultsBetween December 2016 and April 2021, 70 patients were screened and 59 were randomized at six centres. In the mercaptopurine group, 16/29 [55.2%] patients completed the 52-week study, compared to 13/30 [43.3%] on placebo. The primary endpoint was achieved by 14/29 [48.3%] patients on mercaptopurine and 3/30 [10%] receiving placebo (Δ = 38.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1-59.4, p = 0.002). Adverse events occurred more frequently with mercaptopurine [808.8 per 100 patient-years] compared to placebo [501.4 per 100 patient-years]. Five serious adverse events occurred, four on mercaptopurine and one on placebo. TDM-based dose adjustments were executed in 22/29 [75.9%] patients, leading to lower mercaptopurine doses at week 52 compared to baseline.

conclusionsOptimized mercaptopurine treatment was superior to placebo in achieving clinical, endoscopic and histological outcomes at 1 year following corticosteroid induction treatment in UC patients. More adverse events occurred in the mercaptopurine group.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeHumansMercaptopurineMesalamineProspective StudiesRemission InductionMercaptopurineMesalamineimmunomodulatorsrandomized controlled trialtherapeutic drug monitoringUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID36847130
PMCPMC10394500
OpenAlexW4322486504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.