Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847064›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

The role of anatomical context in soft-tissue multi-organ segmentation of cadaveric non-contrast-enhanced whole body CT.

Steven Lewis, Stuart Inglis, Scott Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven LewisDepartment of Pathology Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Stuart InglisDepartment of Pathology Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Scott DoyleDepartment of Pathology Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

Improving Virtual Gross Anatomy: Enhancing the Information Content of Cadaveric CT ScansF31EB030904 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LEWIS, STEVEN · 2021 to 2022
$62k
NIBIB NIH HHS 5F31EB030904NIBIB NIH HHS F31 EB030904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCadaveric computed tomography (CT) image segmentation is a difficult task to solve, especially when applied to whole-body image volumes. Traditional algorithms require preprocessing using registration, or highly conserved organ morphologies. These requirements cannot be fulfilled by cadaveric specimens, so deep learning must be used to overcome this limitation. Further, the widespread use of 2D algorithms for volumetric data ignores the role of anatomical context. The use of 3D spatial context for volumetric segmentation of CT scans as well as the anatomical context required to optimize the segmentation has not been adequately explored. PURPOSE: To determine whether 2D slice-by-slice UNet algorithms or 3D volumetric UNet (VNet) algorithms provide a more effective method for segmenting 3D volumes, and to what extent anatomical context plays in the segmentation of soft-tissue organs in cadaveric, noncontrast-enhanced (NCE) CT.

methodsWe tested five CT segmentation algorithms: 2D UNets with and without 3D data augmentation (3D rotations) as well as VNets with three levels of anatomical context (implemented via image downsampling at 1X, 2X, and 3X) for their performance via 3D Dice coefficients, and Hausdorff distance calculations. The classifiers were trained to segment the kidneys and liver and the performance was evaluated using Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance on the segmentation versus the ground truth annotation.

resultsOur results demonstrate that VNet algorithms perform significantly better (

conclusionsAnatomical context is an important component of soft-tissue, multi-organ segmentation in cadaveric, NCE CT imaging of the whole body. Different amounts of anatomical contexts are optimal depending on the size, position, and surrounding tissue of the organ.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCadaverHumansKidneyLiveranatomical contextcadaveric CTsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36847064
PMCPMC10440264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.