Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36846780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

SARS-CoV-2 raw wastewater surveillance from student residences on an urban university campus.

K T Ash, Y Li, I Alamilla, D C Joyner, D E Williams, P J McKay, B M Green, C Iler, S E DeBlander, C M North and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

K T AshBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Y LiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
I AlamillaStudent Health Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
D C JoynerBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
D E WilliamsCenter for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
P J McKayStudent Health Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
B M GreenDepartment of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
C IlerFacilities Services Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
S E DeBlanderCollege of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
C M NorthStudent Health Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
F Kara-MurdochBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
C M SwiftBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
T C HazenBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about an urgent need to monitor the community prevalence of infection and detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Testing individual people is the most reliable method to measure the spread of the virus in any given community, but it is also the most expensive and time-consuming. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has been used since the 1960s when scientists implemented monitoring to measure the effectiveness of the Polio vaccine. Since then, WBE has been used to monitor populations for various pathogens, drugs, and pollutants. In August 2020, the University of Tennessee-Knoxville implemented a SARS-CoV-2 surveillance program that began with raw wastewater surveillance of the student residence buildings on campus, the results of which were shared with another lab group on campus that oversaw the pooled saliva testing of students. Sample collection began at 8 am, and the final RT-qPCR results were obtained by midnight. The previous day's results were presented to the campus administrators and the Student Health Center at 8 am the following morning. The buildings surveyed included all campus dormitories, fraternities, and sororities, 46 buildings in all representing an on-campus community of over 8,000 students. The WBE surveillance relied upon early morning "grab" samples and 24-h composite sampling. Because we only had three Hach AS950 Portable Peristaltic Sampler units, we reserved 24-h composite sampling for the dormitories with the highest population of students. Samples were pasteurized, and heavy sediment was centrifuged and filtered out, followed by a virus concentration step before RNA extraction. Each sample was tested by RT-qPCR for the presence of SARS-CoV-2, using the CDC primers for N Capsid targets N1 and N3. The subsequent pooled saliva tests from sections of each building allowed lower costs and minimized the total number of individual verification tests that needed to be analyzed by the Student Health Center. Our WBE results matched the trend of the on-campus cases reported by the student health center. The highest concentration of genomic copies detected in one sample was 5.06 × 10

Indexed as

COVID-19raw wastewaterRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2wastewater

Identifiers

PMID36846780
PMCPMC9948028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.