ArticleHeliyon2023
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility study of the assessment of upper limb function in children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy using an end-effector robotic device.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies confirm that children with cerebral palsy (CwCP) have difficulty with simple, everyday movements like reaching for objects. Accurate reaching requires that shoulder and elbow joints are coordinated to move the hand along a smooth path to the desired target location. Here we examined multijoint coordination by comparing reaching performance in the affected and unaffected limbs of CwCP (nine children, six girls and three boys, aged 8-10 years) to reaching performance in the non-dominant and dominant limbs of typically-developing age- and gender-matched control (CTR) children. The hypothesis was that CwCP would show the effects of coordination deficits in both their affected and unaffected limbs. All children performed two sessions (one session with each arm) of speeded reaching movements to three targets arranged to manipulate the required pattern of shoulder and elbow coordination. The movements were tracked with a motion tracker allowing us to assess the following measures: movement distance, duration, and speed, hand-path deviation from linearity, final position accuracy and precision, and measures of shoulder and elbow excursion. We found that CwCP made reaches that covered a greater distance and took more time, that their shoulder and elbow rotations were larger, and that their movements showed greater deviation from linearity than the movements performed by CTR children. Children with CP were also more variable than CTR children on every measure except movement duration. The pattern of shoulder and elbow rotation observed in the CwCP group represents a coordination pattern that is significantly different from the pattern used by CTR children and may represent a greater reliance by CwCP on proximal muscular control systems. The discussion section considers the role that the cortical-spinal system may play in multijoint coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.