Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36846439›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Remote Global Radiation Oncology Education and Training: A Pathway to Increase Access to High-Quality Radiation Therapy Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Awusi Kavuma, Solomon Kibudde, Matthew Schmidt, Tianyu Zhao, Hiram Gay, Benjamin Li, Jeff Michalski, Geoffrey Hugo, Enkhtsetseg Vanchinbazar, Minjmaa Minjgee and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Adaptive radiotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing IMRT/VMAT Competencies in LMICs globally within radiation physicists through remote training.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Awusi KavumaDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Solomon KibuddeDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Matthew SchmidtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Tianyu ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Hiram GayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Benjamin LiRayos Contra Cancer, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jeff MichalskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Geoffrey HugoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Enkhtsetseg VanchinbazarNational Cancer Center of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Minjmaa MinjgeeNational Cancer Center of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Erdenekhuu NansalmaaNational Cancer Center of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Fred SsewamalaBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Angel VelardePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania & Center for Global Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Vicky De FellaLiga Nacional Contra el Cancer/Instituto de Cancerologia, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Milton IxquiacLiga Nacional Contra el Cancer/Instituto de Cancerologia, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Lauren HenkeLiga Nacional Contra el Cancer/Instituto de Cancerologia, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Jacaranda van RheenenGlobal Health Center, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Baozhou SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is a vital need to train radiation therapy professionals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to develop sustainable cancer treatment capacity and infrastructure. LMICs have started to introduce intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which is the standard of care in high-income countries, because of improved outcomes and reduced toxicities. This work reports the efficacy of a complementary asynchronous plus synchronous virtual-training approach on improving radiation therapy professions' self-confidence levels and evaluating participants' attitudes toward asynchronous and synchronous didactic hands-on learning in 3 LMICs. Methods and Materials: Training was provided to 37 participants from Uganda, Guatemala, and Mongolia, which included 4 theoretical lectures, 4 hands-on sessions, and 8 self-guided online videos. The 36-day training focused on IMRT contouring, site-specific target/organ definition, planning/optimization, and quality assurance. Participants completed pre- and postsession confidence surveys on a 0 to 10 scale, which was converted to a 5-point Likert rating scale to evaluate the training outcomes. The pros and cons of the 3 different training formats were compared. Results: The participants included 15 (40.5%) radiation oncologists, 11 (29.7%) medical physicists, 6 (16.2%) radiation therapists, and 5 (13.5%) dosimetrists. Approximately 50% had more than 10 years of radiation therapy experience, 70.8% had no formal IMRT training, and only 25% had IMRT at their institutions. The average experience and confidence levels in using IMRT at baseline were 3.2 and 2.9, which increased to 5.2 and 4.9 ( Conclusions: After completing the training sessions, Uganda and Mongolia started IMRT treatments. Remote training provides an excellent and feasible e-learning platform to train radiation therapy professionals in LMICs. The training program improved the IMRT confidence levels and treatment delivery. The hands-on trainings were most preferred.

Identifiers

PMID36846439
PMCPMC9947225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.