Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36846295›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Normal preoperative endogenous testosterone levels predict prostate cancer progression in elderly patients after radical prostatectomy.

Antonio Benito Porcaro, Andrea Panunzio, Alberto Bianchi, Clara Cerrato, Sebastian Gallina, Emanuele Serafin, Giovanni Mazzucato, Stefano Vidiri, Damiano D'Aietti, Rossella Orlando and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Antonio Benito PorcaroDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-040X
Andrea PanunzioDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alberto BianchiDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Clara CerratoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Sebastian GallinaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Emanuele SerafinDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5646-9719
Giovanni MazzucatoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Stefano VidiriDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Damiano D'AiettiDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Rossella OrlandoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Davide BrusaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore SiracusanoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Vincenzo PagliaruloDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Maria Angela CerrutoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro TafuriDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-2925
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The impact of senior age on prostate cancer (PCa) oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) is controversial, and further clinical factors could help stratifying risk categories in these patients. Objective: We tested the association between endogenous testosterone (ET) and risk of PCa progression in elderly patients treated with RP. Design: Data from PCa patients treated with RP at a single tertiary referral center, between November 2014 and December 2019 with available follow-up, were retrospectively evaluated. Methods: Preoperative ET (classified as normal if >350 ng/dl) was measured for each patient. Patients were divided according to a cut-off age of 70 years. Unfavorable pathology consisted of International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grade group >2, seminal vesicle, and pelvic lymph node invasion. Cox regression models tested the association between clinical/pathological tumor features and risk of PCa progression in each age subgroup. Results: Of 651 included patients, 190 (29.2%) were elderly. Abnormal ET levels were detected in 195 (30.0%) cases. Compared with their younger counterparts, elderly patients were more likely to have pathological ISUP grade group >2 (49.0% Conclusion: In elderly patients, normal preoperative ET independently predicted PCa progression. Elderly patients with normal ET progressed more rapidly than controls, suggesting that longer exposure time to high-grade tumors could adversely impact sequential cancer mutations, where normal ET is not anymore protective on disease progression.

Indexed as

ageelderlyprogressionprostate cancerradical prostatectomytotal testosterone

Identifiers

PMID36846295
PMCPMC9950604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.