Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36846225›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Therapeutic effect of psilocybin in addiction: A systematic review.

Pim B van der Meer, Juan J Fuentes, Ad A Kaptein, Jan W Schoones, Marleen M de Waal, Anneke E Goudriaan, Kees Kramers, Arnt Schellekens, Metten Somers, Matthijs G Bossong and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A contemporary exploration of motivations and practices of psychedelic use among emerging adult cannabis users in the United States: A qualitative analysis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pim B van der MeerDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Juan J FuentesAddiction Program, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ad A KapteinDepartment of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jan W SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marleen M de WaalDepartment of Research and Jellinek, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anneke E GoudriaanDepartment of Research and Jellinek, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kees KramersDepartment of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Arnt SchellekensNijmegen Institute for Science Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Metten SomersDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Matthijs G BossongDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Albert BatallaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychedelic-assisted therapy [e.g., with lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)] has shown promising results as treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). Previous systematic reviews assessing the efficacy of psilocybin in SUDs only included clinical trials conducted in the last 25 years, but they may have missed clinical trials assessing the efficacy of psilocybin that were conducted before the 1980s, given much research has been done with psychedelics in the mid-20th century. In this systematic review, we specifically assessed the efficacy of psilocybin in patients with a SUD or non-substance-related disorder with no publication date restrictions in our search strategy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from the earliest published manuscript up to September 2, 2022, in seven electronic databases, including clinical trials in patients with a SUD or non-substance-related disorder evaluating the efficacy of psilocybin. Results: A total of four studies (six articles, of which two articles were long-term follow-up results from the same trial) were included in this systematic review. Psilocybin-assisted therapy was administered to Conclusion: Only one RCT and three small clinical trials were identified assessing the efficacy of psilocybin combined with some form of psychotherapy in patients with alcohol and tobacco use disorder. All four clinical trials indicated a beneficial effect of psilocybin-assisted therapy on SUD symptoms. Larger RCTs in patients with SUDs need to evaluate whether psilocybin-assisted therapy is effective in patients with SUD.

Indexed as

drug addictionhallucinogenspsilocybinpsychotherapysubstance abusesubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID36846225
PMCPMC9947277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.