ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023
Review on the application of imaging examination for brain injury in premature infants.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bubbles in the barely born-contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neonates: a single-center experience.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Application of snake model imaging selection and analysis to the ultrasound diagnosis of white matter damage in preterm infants.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a cranial ultrasound imaging-based deep learning model for periventricular-intraventricular haemorrhage detection and grading: a two-centre study.Pediatric radiology · 2025Observational
- Construction of an early diagnostic model for brain injury in premature infants based on combined amplitude-integrated electroencephalography and cranial ultrasound parameters.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain injury is the main factor leading to the decline of the quality of life in premature infants. The clinical manifestations of such diseases are often diverse and complex, lacking obvious neurological symptoms and signs, and the disease progresses rapidly. Due to missed diagnosis, it is easy to miss the best treatment opportunity. Brain ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other imaging methods can help clinicians diagnose and assess the type and extent of brain injury in premature infants to some extent, but the three methods have their own characteristics. This article briefly reviews the diagnostic value of these three methods for brain injury in premature infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.