Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36846088›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Paediatric condylar trauma - primary management considerations - A review.

Abhay Taranath Kamath, Sreea Roy, Deepika Pai

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhay Taranath KamathDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manipal Hospital, Ambedkar Circle, Mangaluru, Dakshina Kannada, 575001, Karnataka, India.
Sreea RoyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India.
Deepika PaiDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children are not simply ''small adults'', and the application of adult-type treatment can be inappropriate in many circumstances. Their craniomaxillofacial (CMF) structure changes dramatically as children grow and develop. This anatomical change also changes the location, pattern, and nature of CMF injury. Similarly, condylar architecture and anatomy also differ in children, due to which the management of paediatric condylar fractures is strikingly different from adult condylar fractures. In addition to this physiological, and behavioural differences pose an additional challenge to a surgeon. Paediatric condylar fracture also considers conservative/non-operative treatment as an effective treatment option. However, the decision between operative and non-operative management compromises paediatric facial growth, precise reduction, and rigid fixation. This decision is crucial and is guided by many factors. Improper treatment protocol can have a devastating effect on a child facial growth and development. It can lead to various deforming complications mainly ankylosis. Hence treatment of paediatric condylar fracture should be well planned and executed.

Indexed as

Conservative management of condylar fractureOpen reduction internal fixation of condylar racturePaediatric condylar fracturePaediatric facial traumaPost traumatic Tmj ankylosis

Identifiers

PMID36846088
PMCPMC9950934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.