ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
Pure endoscopic minimally invasive surgery with a non‑expandable tubular retractor for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Technical Considerations: Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Primary Spinal Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hemilaminectomy versus laminoplasty for intradural extramedullary tumors: A comparison of postoperative axial pain and regional outcomes.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Biportal endoscopic resection of thoracic schwannoma: surgical technique and strategies to overcome key challenges.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Systematic Review Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Intradural Extramedullary Tumours (IDEM).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Full-endoscopic spine surgery for intradural pathologies: A systematic review of innovations, challenges, and future prospects.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Full-endoscopic surgery in spinal oncology: a systematic review of clinical efficacy and outcomes.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Review
- Intradural extramedullary thoracic epidermoid cyst in the absence of dysraphism: A case report and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal tumors is a safe and effective surgical strategy. Currently, various tubular retractors are widely used in the MISS of IDEM spinal tumors, primarily relying on microscopic visualization. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no report of pure endoscopic surgery with parallel non-expandable tubular retractors for IDEM spinal lesions. The present study reports a case series of IDEM spinal tumors that were treated via pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor. The extent of tumor resection was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial and follow-up clinical conditions were assessed according to the visual analog scale for pain and the modified McCormick scale for neurological status. Postoperative MRI demonstrated that all cases had achieved a gross total resection. After the operation, the clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved and there were no serious postoperative complications. At the initial follow-up, the pain experienced by the patients was significantly reduced or had even disappeared, and the neurological deficit was improved by at least one grade on the modified McCormick scale. The present report indicates that pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor may be an effective and safe surgical strategy for IDEM spinal tumor resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.