Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845956›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023

Pure endoscopic minimally invasive surgery with a non‑expandable tubular retractor for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors.

Gang Zhang, Bin Jia, Pan Wang, Chaoling Xu, Jie Liu, Chao Tang, Haotian Jiang, Xiaorong Tan, Nan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Bin JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Pan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Chaoling XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Chao TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Haotian JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Xiaorong TanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.
Nan WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal tumors is a safe and effective surgical strategy. Currently, various tubular retractors are widely used in the MISS of IDEM spinal tumors, primarily relying on microscopic visualization. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no report of pure endoscopic surgery with parallel non-expandable tubular retractors for IDEM spinal lesions. The present study reports a case series of IDEM spinal tumors that were treated via pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor. The extent of tumor resection was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial and follow-up clinical conditions were assessed according to the visual analog scale for pain and the modified McCormick scale for neurological status. Postoperative MRI demonstrated that all cases had achieved a gross total resection. After the operation, the clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved and there were no serious postoperative complications. At the initial follow-up, the pain experienced by the patients was significantly reduced or had even disappeared, and the neurological deficit was improved by at least one grade on the modified McCormick scale. The present report indicates that pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor may be an effective and safe surgical strategy for IDEM spinal tumor resection.

Indexed as

intradural extramedullary tumorsminimally invasive spinal surgerynon-expandable tubular retractorpure endoscopyspinal tumors

Identifiers

PMID36845956
PMCPMC9947587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.