Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845870›Full record

ArticleComputing in cardiology2020

Using UncertainSCI to Quantify Uncertainty in Cardiac Simulations.

Lindsay C Rupp, Zexin Liu, Jake A Bergquist, Sumientra Rampersad, Dan White, Jess D Tate, Dana H Brooks, Akil Narayan, Rob S MacLeod

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computing in cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay C RuppScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Zexin LiuScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Jake A BergquistScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Sumientra RampersadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern, BOS, MA, USA.
Dan WhiteScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Jess D TateScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Dana H BrooksDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern, BOS, MA, USA.
Akil NarayanScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Rob S MacLeodScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
University of Utah · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
Integration of Uncertainty Quantification with SCIRun Bioelectric Field Simulation PipelineU24EB029012 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029012NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac simulations have become increasingly accurate at representing physiological processes. However, simulations often fail to capture the impact of parameter uncertainty in predictions. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a set of techniques that captures variability in simulation output based on model assumptions. Although many UQ methods exist, practical implementation can be challenging. We created UncertainSCI, a UQ framework that uses polynomial chaos (PC) expansion to model the forward stochastic error in simulations parameterized with random variables. UncertainSCI uses non-intrusive methods that parsimoniously explores parameter space. The result is an efficient, stable, and accurate PC emulator that can be analyzed to compute output statistics. We created a Python API to run UncertainSCI, minimizing user inputs needed to guide the UQ process. We have implemented UncertainSCI to: (1) quantify the sensitivity of computed torso potentials using the boundary element method to uncertainty in the heart position, and (2) quantify the sensitivity of computed torso potentials using the finite element method to uncertainty in the conductivities of biological tissues. With UncertainSCI, it is possible to evaluate the robustness of simulations to parameter uncertainty and establish realistic expectations on the accuracy of the model results and the clinical guidance they can provide.

Identifiers

PMID36845870
PMCPMC9956381
OpenAlexW3118559110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.