Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845868›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach.

Michela Cinquini, Nicola Rocco, Giuseppe Catanuto, Emanuele Garreffa, Pietro Maria Ferrando, Marien Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Anna Maglia, Giacomo Montagna, Amedeo Villanucci, Valentina Visintini Cividin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michela CinquiniUnit of Systematic Reviews Methodology and Guidelines Production, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Nicola RoccoG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe CatanutoG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Emanuele GarreffaBreast Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK.
Pietro Maria FerrandoPlastic Surgery, Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Marien Gonzalez-LorenzoUnit of Systematic Reviews Methodology and Guidelines Production, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Anna MagliaClinical Data Coordinator, Medpace, Leuven, Belgium.
Giacomo MontagnaBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.
Amedeo VillanucciBreast Surgery Department, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Territorial Area of Prato, Italy.
Valentina Visintini CividinPlastic Surgery Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.
Maurizio Bruno NavaG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Naples, Catania, Italy.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITAzienda Usl Toscana Centro · ITCTO Hospital · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) entered the market in the early 2000s and their use has increased thereafter. Several retrospective cohort studies and single surgeon series reported benefits with the use of ADMs. However, robust evidence supporting these advantages is lacking. There is the need to define the role for ADMs in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) after mastectomy. Methods: A panel of world-renowned breast specialists was convened to evaluate evidence, express personal viewpoints, and establish recommendation for the use of ADMs for subpectoral one-/two-stage IBBR (compared with no ADM use) for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Based on the voting outcome, the following recommendation emerged as a consensus statement: the panel members suggest subpectoral one- or two-stage IBBR either with ADMs or without ADMs for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction (with very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: The systematic review has revealed a very low certainty of evidence for most of the important outcomes in ADM-assisted IBBR and the absence of standard tools for evaluating clinical outcomes. Forty-five percent of panel members expressed a conditional recommendation either in favor of or against the use of ADMs in subpectoral one- or two-stages IBBR for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction. Future subgroup analyses could help identify relevant clinical and pathological factors to select patients for whom one technique could be preferable to another.

Identifiers

PMID36845868
PMCPMC9946425
OpenAlexW4321483227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.