ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Evaluation of Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery Using a Crowdsourced Patient Survey.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing ChatGPT and Gemini Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Augmentation Mammaplasty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Data: Health Numeracy and Its Impact on Decision-Making in Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: A Pilot Study Using Artificial Intelligence to Make Plastic Surgery Research Accessible.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Misconceptions in Plastic Surgery: Crowdsourcing Public Perceptions of Plastic Surgery Urban Myths.Eplasty · 2025Article
- An Essential Infinitebook for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Preoperative Planning.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Triage Tool during the Perioperative Period: Pilot Study of Accuracy and Accessibility for Clinical Application.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known about the levels of health literacy (HL) among plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) patients compared with the general population. This study aimed to characterize HL levels in patients interested in plastic surgery and identify potential risk factors associated with inadequate levels of HL among this population. Methods: Amazon's Mechanical Turk was used to distribute a survey. The Chew's Brief Health Literacy Screener was used to evaluate the level of HL. The cohort was divided into two groups: non-PRS and PRS groups. Four subgroups were created: cosmetic, noncosmetic, reconstructive, and nonreconstructive groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess associations between levels of HL and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 510 responses were analyzed in this study. Of those, 34% of participants belong to the PRS group and 66% to the non-PRS group. Inadequate levels of HL were evidenced in 52% and 50% of the participants in the non-PRS and PRS groups, respectively ( Conclusions: Inadequate levels of HL were present in almost half of the cohort, which highlights the importance of adequately assessing HL levels in all patients. It is of utmost importance to evaluate HL in clinical practice using evidence-based criteria to better inform and educate patients interested in plastic surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.