Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845865›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Prophylactic Antibiotics for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison between Three Different Duration Approaches.

Chih-Hsuan Changchien, Chien-Liang Fang, Chong-Bin Tsai, Chin-Hao Hsu, Hsin-Yi Yang, Ming-Shan Chen, Yi-Ling Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chih-Hsuan ChangchienDivision of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.
Chien-Liang FangDivision of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.
Chong-Bin TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.
Chin-Hao HsuDivision of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yi YangClinical Medical Research Center, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.
Ming-Shan ChenDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling LinDivision of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. We attempted to standardize the use of prophylactic antibiotics after mastectomy using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for the breast reconstruction procedure. Methods: This retrospective case series included 108 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap at the Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital between 2012 and 2019. Patients were divided into three groups based on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration (1, 3, and >7 days) for patients with drains. Data were analyzed between January and April 2021. Results: The prevalence of surgical site infection in the breast was 0.93% (1/108), and in the abdomen it was 0%. The patient groups did not differ by age, body mass index, smoking status, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Only one patient experienced surgical site infection in the breast after half-deep necrosis of the inferior epigastric perforator flap. There were no significant differences in surgical site infection based on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use. The operation time, methods of breast surgery, volume of fluid drainage in the first 3 days of the abdominal and breast drains, and day of removal of the abdominal and breast drains did not affect surgical site infection. Conclusion: Based on these data, we do not recommend extending prophylactic antibiotics beyond 24 hours in deep inferior epigastric perforator reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID36845865
PMCPMC9946379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.