Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845857›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2023

Protection From Second Warm Ischemic Injury Using a Thermal Barrier Bag in Kidney Transplantation.

Kentaro Ide, Ryosuke Nakano, Yuki Imaoka, Hiroshi Sakai, Kosuke Ono, Naoki Tanimine, Hiroyuki Tahara, Masahiro Ohira, Keiko Ueda, Taizo Hirata and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06611189 (A Comparative Analysis of Ray-Tech Sponge and Ice Bag Techniques in the Elimination of Warm Ischemic Time in Kidney Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06611189 active not recruitingnot on this map

A Comparative Analysis of Ray-Tech Sponge and Ice Bag Techniques in the Elimination of Warm Ischemic Time in Kidney Transplantation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOkan UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled172ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease Stage VArmssurgery, Ray-Tech sponge technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kentaro IdeDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryosuke NakanoDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuki ImaokaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshi SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kosuke OnoDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Naoki TanimineDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroyuki TaharaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masahiro OhiraDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keiko UedaClinical Research Center in Hiroshima, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Taizo HirataClinical Research Center in Hiroshima, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Eiji KobayashiDepartment of Kidney Regenerative Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki OhdanDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second warm ischemic injury during vascular anastomosis not only adversely affects immediate posttransplant function but also affects long-term patient and graft survival. We developed a pouch-type thermal barrier bag (TBB) composed of a transparent, biocompatible insulation material suitably designed for kidneys and conducted the first-in-human clinical trial. Methods: A living-donor nephrectomy was performed using a minimum skin incision procedure. After back table preparation, the kidney graft was placed inside the TBB and preserved during vascular anastomosis. The graft surface temperature was measured before and after vascular anastomosis using a noncontact infrared thermometer. After completion of the anastomosis, the TBB was removed from the transplanted kidney before graft reperfusion. Clinical data, including patient characteristics and perioperative variables, were collected. The primary endpoint was safety, which was assessed by evaluating adverse events. The secondary endpoints were the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of the TBB in kidney transplant recipients. Results: Ten living-donor kidney transplant recipients with a median age of 56 y (range, 39-69 y) were enrolled in this study. No serious adverse events related to the TBB were observed. The median second warm ischemic time was 31 (27-39) min, and the median graft surface temperature at the end of anastomosis was 16.1 °C (12.8-18.7 °C). Conclusions: TBB can maintain transplanted kidneys at a low temperature during vascular anastomosis, which contributes to the functional preservation of transplanted kidneys and stable transplant outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID36845857
PMCPMC9945486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.