ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Validation of cost-effective model for breast self-examination.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysing Breast Cancer Screening Trends in Rural Saudi Arabia: Vision 2030 Context.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Breast Health Education as a Motivator for Breast Self-Examination Practice in High-Risk Women: Grounded Theory Analysis.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2026Article
- Breast cancer awareness and breast self-examination among females in the Middle East and North Africa: a multinational cross-sectional study.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of 3D-printed tumor palpation models for surgical training and patient education.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- What makes women receptive to breast self-examination, animation, or simulation? - a comparative study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of breast cancer is increasing in India; it predominantly affects women in their 30s and 40s. The disease burden is very high given the high incidence of triple-negative disease in a large portion of the population. Early detection can save lives and aid in breast conservation surgery. Breast self-examination (BSE) is a valid tool for early breast cancer detection. If performed with the help of a simulation model that resembles a given culture and tradition, it can result in good outcomes from screening programs. We designed and validated an Indian model for BSE and reported the feasibility of this model. Materials and methods: We designed an Indian model for the BSE based on the cultural mindset of Indian women. The design was finalized, and the model was constructed. It was then compared with preexisting international models and validated by in-depth interviews with validation experts from various fields involved in breast cancer management. Minor design revisions were made, followed by testing and re-testing. Finally, it was ready for public use. Results: The in-depth interview was conducted using a validated modified animation multimedia questionnaire. The majority of the validation experts had used stimulation models before, and all stated that it could help teach women about BSE, and it was comparable with other preexisting internationally validated models (91.33±4.98%). Conclusion: Using a breast model, women can learn to detect breast cancer as early as possible, and this can lead to good outcomes. We designed the model using easily available, cheap, and safe materials to keep it as realistic and useful as possible. The Indian BSE model can be used by Indian women to learn to detect breast lumps early. It is easily reproducible and cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.