ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical study ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the use of Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled female patients with primary breast cancer between September 2017 and June 2022 at Fujian Provincial Hospital. The participants were divided into the peritumoral group (two subcutaneous injection points on the surface of the tumor), two-site group (injections into the glands at 6 and 12 o'clock around the areola area), and four-site group (injections into the gland at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock around the areola area). The outcomes were the detection rates of the IM-SLNs and axillary sentinel lymph nodes (A-SLNs). Results: Finally, 133 patients were enrolled, including 53 in the peritumoral group, 60 in the two-site group, and 20 in the four-site group. The detection rate of the IM-SLNs in the peritumoral group (9.4% [5/53]) was significantly lower than in the two-site (61.7% [37/60], P<0.001) and four-site (50.0% [10/20], P<0.001) groups. The detection rates of A-SLNs among the three groups were comparable (P=0.436). Conclusion: The two-site or four-site intra-gland injection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.