Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Different pathological response and histological features following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Greta Alì, Anello Marcello Poma, Iosè Di Stefano, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa, Alessandra Lenzini, Giulia Martinelli, Gaetano Romano, Antonio Chella, Editta Baldini, Franca Melfi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Greta AlìUnit of Pathological Anatomy, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Anello Marcello PomaDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Iosè Di StefanoDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Carmelina Cristina ZirafaMultispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra LenziniMultispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia MartinelliDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gaetano RomanoMultispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio ChellaUnit of Pneumology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Editta BaldiniMedical Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy.
Franca MelfiMultispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriella FontaniniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has led to clinical benefits in resectable NSCLC in comparison to chemo-therapy alone. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) have been used as surrogates of neoadjuvant therapy response and clinical outcomes. However, the factors affecting the pathological response are still controversial. Therefore, in this study we retrospectively examined MPR and pCR in two different cohorts of NSCLC patients, 14 treated by chemotherapy and 12 by chemo-immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: In resected tumor specimens, different histological characteristics were evaluated: necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, presence of organizing pneumonia, granuloma, cholesterol cleft, and reactive epithelial alterations. In addition, we evaluated how MPR impacts on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In a small group of patients treated by chemo-immunotherapy, a gene expression analysis of the Hippo pathway was performed both in preoperative biopsies and matched post-surgical specimens. Results: We observed a better pathological response in the chemo-immunotherapy treated cohort: 6/12 patients (50.0%) achieved a MPR ≤10% and 1/12 (8.3%) achieved pCR both on primary tumor and on lymph nodes. On the contrary, no patient treated with chemotherapy alone achieved pCR or MPR ≤10%. A higher amount of stroma in the neoplastic bed was observed in patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Moreover, patients achieving better MPR (including pCR) had significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). After neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, residual tumors showed a remarkable upregulation of genes consistent with the activation of YAP/TAZ. Also, alternative checkpoint, such as CTLA-4, were enhanced. Discussion: Our findings showed that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment improves MPR and pCR thus resulting in better EFS and OS. Moreover, a combined treatment could induce different morphological and molecular changes in comparison to chemotherapy alone, thus giving new insights in the assessment of pathological response.

Indexed as

biomarkerschemo-immunotherapyneoadjuvant therapynon-small cell lung cancerpathological responseprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36845706
PMCPMC9947557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.