ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Different pathological response and histological features following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics-Based AI for Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Pathological response and tumor regression grading following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Reframing tumor bed evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer: histopathological challenges and future directions in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A narrative review of pathologic response in non-small cell lung cancer: challenges, implications, and future directions.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for histopathologic subtyping of primary lung adenocarcinoma.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- The time-to-surgery interval and its effect on pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- The efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Establishing a model composed of immune-related gene-modules to predict tumor immunotherapy response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and survival surrogate analysis of neoadjuvant treatment in IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade: A window of opportunity to advance cancer immunotherapy.Cancer cell · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has led to clinical benefits in resectable NSCLC in comparison to chemo-therapy alone. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) have been used as surrogates of neoadjuvant therapy response and clinical outcomes. However, the factors affecting the pathological response are still controversial. Therefore, in this study we retrospectively examined MPR and pCR in two different cohorts of NSCLC patients, 14 treated by chemotherapy and 12 by chemo-immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: In resected tumor specimens, different histological characteristics were evaluated: necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, presence of organizing pneumonia, granuloma, cholesterol cleft, and reactive epithelial alterations. In addition, we evaluated how MPR impacts on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In a small group of patients treated by chemo-immunotherapy, a gene expression analysis of the Hippo pathway was performed both in preoperative biopsies and matched post-surgical specimens. Results: We observed a better pathological response in the chemo-immunotherapy treated cohort: 6/12 patients (50.0%) achieved a MPR ≤10% and 1/12 (8.3%) achieved pCR both on primary tumor and on lymph nodes. On the contrary, no patient treated with chemotherapy alone achieved pCR or MPR ≤10%. A higher amount of stroma in the neoplastic bed was observed in patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Moreover, patients achieving better MPR (including pCR) had significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). After neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, residual tumors showed a remarkable upregulation of genes consistent with the activation of YAP/TAZ. Also, alternative checkpoint, such as CTLA-4, were enhanced. Discussion: Our findings showed that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment improves MPR and pCR thus resulting in better EFS and OS. Moreover, a combined treatment could induce different morphological and molecular changes in comparison to chemotherapy alone, thus giving new insights in the assessment of pathological response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.