ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Deep learning-based algorithm improves radiologists' performance in lung cancer bone metastases detection on computed tomography.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting tumor bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive performance of image processing techniques in the diagnosis of bone metastasis: A meta-analysis of a confusion matrix.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- LungDxFormer: a transformer-CNN hybrid model with dynamic spatial attention for accurate lung cancer detection and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research progress of artificial intelligence in bone tumor imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Enhancing bone cancer detection through optimized pre trained deep learning models and explainable AI using the osteosarcoma tumor assessment dataset.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- A clinically applicable AI system for detection and diagnosis of bone metastases using CT scans.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Reducing the workload of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence: A narrative review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Swarm learning network for privacy-preserving and collaborative deep learning assisted diagnosis of fracture: a multi-center diagnostic study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- The efficacy of machine learning models in lung cancer risk prediction with explainability.PloS one · 2024Article
- Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and assess a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model for the automatic detection of bone metastases from lung cancer on computed tomography (CT). Methods: In this retrospective study, CT scans acquired from a single institution from June 2012 to May 2022 were included. In total, 126 patients were assigned to a training cohort (n = 76), a validation cohort (n = 12), and a testing cohort (n = 38). We trained and developed a DCNN model based on positive scans with bone metastases and negative scans without bone metastases to detect and segment the bone metastases of lung cancer on CT. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of the DCNN model in an observer study with five board-certified radiologists and three junior radiologists. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the sensitivity and false positives of the detection performance; the intersection-over-union and dice coefficient were used to evaluate the segmentation performance of predicted lung cancer bone metastases. Results: The DCNN model achieved a detection sensitivity of 0.894, with 5.24 average false positives per case, and a segmentation dice coefficient of 0.856 in the testing cohort. Through the radiologists-DCNN model collaboration, the detection accuracy of the three junior radiologists improved from 0.617 to 0.879 and the sensitivity from 0.680 to 0.902. Furthermore, the mean interpretation time per case of the junior radiologists was reduced by 228 s (p = 0.045). Conclusions: The proposed DCNN model for automatic lung cancer bone metastases detection can improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce the diagnosis time and workload of junior radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.