ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Deep learning-based morphological feature analysis and the prognostic association study in colon adenocarcinoma histopathological images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Simulation-Based Stress-Testing Framework for Evaluating the Transportability of Imaging-Derived Logistic Risk Models Across Cutaneous Lesion Phenotypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal fusion-based prediction of postoperative survival in gallbladder adenocarcinoma: Model development and validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Uncovering Hidden Prognostic Patterns in Colorectal Cancer Histology Using Unsupervised Learning: A Computational Pathology Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Two decades of artificial intelligence in colon cancer diagnosis and treatment: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2003-2023).Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Decision level scheme for fusing multiomics and histology slide images using deep neural network for tumor prognosis prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF COLON CANCER: A RAY OF HOPE.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based pathomics signature for prognosis and chemotherapy benefits in colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Identification of Anomalies in Lung and Colon Cancer Using Computer Vision-Based Swin Transformer with Ensemble Model on Histopathological Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploiting histopathological imaging for early detection of lung and colon cancer via ensemble deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Nextflow pipeline for Visium and H&E data from patient-derived xenograft samples.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based histological predictions of chromosomal instability in colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is now the third most common malignancy to cause mortality worldwide, and its prognosis is of great importance. Recent CRC prognostic prediction studies mainly focused on biomarkers, radiometric images, and end-to-end deep learning methods, while only a few works paid attention to exploring the relationship between the quantitative morphological features of patients' tissue slides and their prognosis. However, existing few works in this area suffered from the drawback of choosing the cells randomly from the whole slides, which contain the non-tumor region that lakes information about prognosis. In addition, the existing works, which tried to demonstrate their biological interpretability using patients' transcriptome data, failed to show the biological meaning closely related to cancer. In this study, we proposed and evaluated a prognostic model using morphological features of cells in the tumor region. The features were first extracted by the software CellProfiler from the tumor region selected by Eff-Unet deep learning model. Features from different regions were then averaged for each patient as their representative, and the Lasso-Cox model was used to select the prognosis-related features. The prognostic prediction model was at last constructed using the selected prognosis-related features and was evaluated through KM estimate and cross-validation. In terms of biological meaning, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the expressed genes that correlated with the prognostically significant features was performed to show the biological interpretability of our model.With the help of tumor segmentation, our model achieved better statistical significance and better biological interpretability compared to the results without tumor segmentation. Statistically, the Kaplan Meier (KM) estimate of our model showed that the model using features in the tumor region has a higher C-index, a lower p-value, and a better performance on cross-validation than the model without tumor segmentation. In addition, revealing the pathway of the immune escape and the spread of the tumor, the model with tumor segmentation demonstrated a biological meaning much more related to cancer immunobiology than the model without tumor segmentation. Our prognostic prediction model using quantitive morphological features from tumor regions was almost as good as the TNM tumor staging system as they had a close C-index, and our model can be combined with the TNM tumor stage system to make a better prognostic prediction. And to the best of our knowledge, the biological mechanisms in our study were the most relevant to the immune mechanism of cancer compared to the previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.