Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845678›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023

Effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors in tumor therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao Wei, Mingzhu Song, Chan Huang, Qiao Yu, Guirong Jiang, Guanghao Jin, Xibiao Jia, Zheng Shi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao WeiSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Mingzhu SongSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Chan HuangSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Qiao YuSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Guirong JiangSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Guanghao JinSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Xibiao JiaKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Birth Defects and Related Maternal and Child Diseases, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zheng ShiClinical Genetics Laboratory, Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To provide a systematic review of existing meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) inhibitors in various tumor treatments, and assess the methodological quality and the strength of evidence of the included meta-analysis. Methods: The Medline, PubMed, Embase, etc. were searched and updated on 30 June 2022. 22 eligible clinical trials involving a total of 1256 patients were included for analyses. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared the efficacy or safety, or both of any Plk1 inhibitors with placebo (active or inert) in participants. To be included, studies had to be RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and nonrandomized comparative studies. Results: A meta-analysis of two trials reported progression-free survival (PFS) of the overall population (effect size (ES), 1.01; 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.73-1.30, Conclusions: Plk1 inhibitors work better in improving OS and they are well tolerated, effective and safe in reducing the severity of illness while improving the quality of life, especially in patients with non-specific tumors, respiratory system tumors, musculoskeletal system tumors, and urinary system tumors. However, they fail to prolong the PFS. From the vertical whole level analysis, compared to other systems in the body, Plk1 inhibitors should be avoided as far as possible for the treatment of tumors related to the blood circulatory system, digestive system and nervous system, which were attributed to the intervention of Plk1 inhibitors associated with an increased risk of AEs in these systems. The toxicity caused by immunotherapy should be carefully considered. Conversely, a horizontal comparison of three different types of Plk1 inhibitors suggested that Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) might be relatively suitable for the treatment of tumors associated with the digestive system, while Volasertib (BI 6727) might be even less suitable for the treatment of tumors associated with the blood circulation system. Additionally, in the dose selection of Plk1 inhibitors, the low dose of 100 mg should be preferred, and meanwhile, it can also ensure the pharmacokinetic efficacy that is indistinguishable from the high dose of 200 mg. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022343507.

Indexed as

effectivenesspharmacokineticsPLK1 inhibitorssafetytumor therapy

Identifiers

PMID36845678
PMCPMC9947705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.