Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845670›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2023

Online on-demand delivery services of food and alcohol: A scoping review of public health impacts.

Cassian Duthie, Tessa Pocock, Angela Curl, Elinor Clark, Dru Norriss, Susan Bidwell, Christina McKerchar, Rose Crossin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feeding health inequality through platform-based food delivery in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Profiling users and non-users of meal delivery services in Belgium using latent class analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resisting technological inevitability: Google Wing's delivery drones and the fight for our skies.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cassian DuthieUniversity of Otago Medical School, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Tessa PocockSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Angela CurlDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Elinor ClarkUniversity of Otago Medical School, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Dru NorrissDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Susan BidwellDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christina McKercharDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rose CrossinDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in availability of online on-demand food and alcohol delivery services has changed the way unhealthy commodities are accessed and understood. We conducted a systematic scoping review of academic and grey literature to map the current knowledge of public health and regulatory/policy outcomes arising from on-demand food and alcohol delivery (defined as delivery within 2 h). We systematically searched three electronic databases and completed supplementary forward citation searches and Google Scholar searches. In total, we screened 761 records (de-duplicated) and synthesised findings from 40 studies by commodity types (on-demand food or alcohol) and outcome focus (outlet, consumer, environmental, labour). Outlet-focused outcomes were most common (n = 16 studies), followed by consumer (n = 11), environmental (n = 7), and labour-focused (n = 6) outcomes. Despite geographical and methodological diversity of studies, results indicate that on-demand delivery services market unhealthy and discretionary foods, with disadvantaged communities having reduced access to healthy commodities. Services that deliver alcohol on-demand can also subvert current alcohol access restrictions, particularly through poor age verification processes. Underpinning these public health impacts is the multi-layered nature of on-demand services and context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which creates ongoing complications as to how populations access food and alcohol. Changing access to unhealthy commodities is an emerging issue in public health. Our scoping review considers priority areas for future research to better inform policy decisions. Current regulation of food and alcohol may not appropriately cover emerging on-demand technologies, necessitating a review of policy.

Indexed as

Alcohol deliveryAlcohol environmentFood deliveryFood environmentMeal delivery appsRapid delivery

Identifiers

PMID36845670
PMCPMC9950721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.