Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845646›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

Datasets for training and validating a deep learning-based system to detect microfossil fish teeth from slide images.

Kazuhide Mimura, Kentaro Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kazuhide MimuraOcean Resources Research Center for Next Generation, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan.
Kentaro NakamuraFrontier Research Center for Energy and Resources, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the three datasets that were used to train, validate, and test deep learning models to detect microfossil fish teeth. The first dataset was created for training and validating a Mask R-CNN model to detect fish teeth in the images taken using the microscope. The training set contained 866 images and one annotation file; the validation set contained 92 images and one annotation file. The second dataset was created for training and validating EfficientNet-V2 models; it included 17,400 images of teeth and 15,036 images that contained only noise (particles other than teeth). The third dataset was created to evaluate the performance of a system that combines a Mask R-CNN model and an EfficientNet-V2 model; it contained 5177 images with annotation files for the locations of 431 teeth within the images.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEfficientNet-V2IchthyolithImage classificationMachine learningMask R-CNNObject detection

Identifiers

PMID36845646
PMCPMC9945703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.