Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845639›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2023

Perception of Dental House Officers regarding Endodontic File Separation during Endodontic Treatment.

Manahil Maqbool, Syeda Sobia Masood Tirmazi, Asma Shakoor, Zunaira Akram, Rutaba Nazir, Arham Nawaz Chohan, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Tahir Yusuf Noorani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manahil MaqboolPaediatric Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Syeda Sobia Masood TirmaziOperative Dentistry Department, CMH-Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Pakistan.
Asma ShakoorCommunity & Preventive Dentistry Department, CMH-Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Pakistan.
Zunaira AkramDepartment of Oral Biology, UHS-University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Rutaba NazirPakistan Atomic Energy Commission General Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Arham Nawaz ChohanDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College National University of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohmed Isaqali KarobariDepartment of Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh 12211, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-9695
Tahir Yusuf NooraniConservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-7458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite of having improved endodontic file designs as well as the reinforced metal alloy file structure, intracanal endodontic file separation (EFS) is still a very problematic and worrisome dental incident, which usually occurs without any visible signs of permanent deformation. Further, there have been conflicting reports regarding the clinical significance of leaving separated files within root canals. Aims: The aim of this study was to look into the current perceptions and awareness about file separation during endodontic treatment among the dental house officers (DHOs). Materials and Methods: A novel validated questionnaire comprising of 15 close-ended questions was distributed anonymously via Google Forms through email to 1100 DHOs across Pakistan. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first component (Section I) collected demographic data and the second component (Section II) investigated the causes of EFS during root canal treatment. Following the completion of socioeconomic information, including age and gender, the DHOs were asked to answer a few questions about the various reasons for endodontic instrument fracture. Results: A total of 800 responses were recorded, with an effective rate of 72.8%. The majority of the DHOs ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated that young DHOs had adequate knowledge and awareness regarding the potential predisposing factors and handling techniques for EFS. This study thereby provides an evaluating tool to access the insights of the current perceptions and awareness of DHOs concerning EFS.

Indexed as

Root Canal PreparationRoot Canal TherapyAgedDental AlloysDental InstrumentsDental Pulp CavityEquipment DesignEquipment FailureHumansPerceptionTitaniumDental AlloysTitanium

Identifiers

PMID36845639
PMCPMC9949941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.