Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845632›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

A systematic review of measures of gender and biological sex: Exploring candidates for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) research.

Shana D Stites, Hannah Cao, Richard James, Kristin Harkins, Cameron Coykendall, Jason D Flatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shana D StitesDepartment of Psychiatry Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-4343
Hannah CaoSchool of Social Policy and Practice University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Richard JamesUniversity of Pennsylvania Libraries Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-0259
Kristin HarkinsDivision of Geriatric Medicine Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-1043
Cameron CoykendallDivision of Geriatric Medicine Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-401X
Jason D FlattDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health School of Public Health University of Nevada Las Vegas Nevada USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-738X

Funding

Research Centers Collaborative Network RenewalU24AG058556 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRITCHEVSKY, STEPHEN B., LEDERMAN, STEPHANIE · 2018 to 2025
$7.5M
Study of Cognitive Symptoms and Future Time Perspective in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseK23AG065442 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STITES, SHANA D. · 2020 to 2024
$886k
The Epidemiology of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults: Identifying Risk and Protective FactorsK01AG056669 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI FLATT, JASON DANE · 2018 to 2022
$666k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG056669NIA NIH HHS K23 AG065442NIA NIH HHS U24 AG058556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gender and biological sex are social and structural determinants of health and umbrella concepts encompassing many distinct attributes. This systematic review summarizes measures of gender and biological sex published in the biomedical literature. The goal was to identify measures that may be useful to researchers studying Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD). Methods: A search of PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO (ProQuest platform) databases from 2000 to 2021 identified 1454 articles, which were then screened by five independent reviewers. Measures of gender and biological sex are summarized according to theoretical commitments and psychometric properties. Results: Twenty-nine measures were identified that assessed gender-related constructs, and 4 were identified that assessed biological factors. Self-report instruments characterized aspects of gender, such as gender stereotypes, norms, and ideologies. One measure was developed with a focus on older adults (65+ years). Discussion: We offer recommendations to guide measurement of gender in AD/ADRD research, including how the use of specific existing measures may help advance AD/ADRD research. The lack of gender measures for older adults limits AD/ADRD research. New measures may be needed to address lifespan and generational differences in gender factors. Highlights: A review of articles identifies 29 measures of gender in biomedical research.Gender is captured using multidimensional, self-reported concepts.One measure was developed with a focus on older adults (65+).

Identifiers

PMID36845632
PMCPMC9943901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.