Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845570›Full record

ArticleOxford open immunology2021

Medawar and the immunological paradox of pregnancy: in context.

Victoria Male

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford open immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Contributions of large and agricultural animal models to immunology.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Placenta: an old organ with new functions.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  7. Human embryo implantation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Victoria MaleDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-5083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1953, Peter Medawar defined 'the immunological paradox of pregnancy', whereby the semi-allogeneic foetus can survive for 9 months in its mother, while a semi-allogeneic graft would be rejected. Here, I revisit the immunological paradox of pregnancy, setting it in the context of the time in which it was proposed. I go on to examine the extent to which Medawar's ideas on the subject have stood the test of time and how they have shaped reproductive immunology.

Identifiers

PMID36845570
PMCPMC9914476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.