ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Vitrectomized Eye.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF may be reduced in vitrectomized eyes due to accelerated drug clearance. Given its longer durability, brolucizumab may represent a suitable therapeutic option. However, its efficacy in vitrectomized eyes remains to be explored. Herein, we describe the management of a macular neovascularization (MNV) in a vitrectomized eye with brolucizumab after unsuccessful treatment with other anti-VEGF. A 68-year-old male was treated with pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane in his left eye (LE) in 2018. After surgery, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved to 20/20 with a remarkable reduction of metamorphopsia. After 3 years, the patient returned, presenting visual loss in the LE due to MNV. He was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections. However, after the loading phase, an increased lesion size and exudation with worsening BCVA were detected. Therefore, the treatment was switched to aflibercept. However, after three monthly intravitreal injections, further worsening was recorded. Treatment was then switched to brolucizumab. Anatomical and functional improvement was noticed 1 month after the first brolucizumab injection. Two additional injections were performed, and further improvement was recorded with BCVA recovery to 20/20. At the last follow-up visit 2 months after the third injection, no recurrence was detected. In conclusion, determining whether anti-VEGF injections are efficacious for vitrectomized eyes would be helpful for ophthalmologists managing such patients, as well as when considering pars plana vitrectomy in eyes at risk of MNV. In our case, brolucizumab was found to be effective after unsuccessful treatment with other anti-VEGF. Additional studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab for MNV in vitrectomized eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.