Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845443›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury.

Liang Zhou, Yuanyi Chen, Ziyuan Liu, Jia You, Siming Chen, Ganzhi Liu, Yang Yu, Jian Wang, Xin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liang ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yuanyi ChenCentral of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ziyuan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jia YouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Siming ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ganzhi LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yang YuCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. Objectives: We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. Methods: The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. Results: A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, Conclusion: This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions.

Indexed as

acute brain injurycomaelectroencephalogram (EEG)mismatch negativity (MMN)prediction modelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36845443
PMCPMC9945265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.