Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845304›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award Program hubs: Overview of an environmental scan.

Boris B Volkov, Bart Ragon, Jamie Mihoko Doyle, Miriam A Bredella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translational science at the undergraduate level: awakening talents to overcome the valley of death - case report.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boris B VolkovUniversity of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5412-3028
Bart Ragonintegrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-3019
Jamie Mihoko DoyleDivision of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-3089
Miriam A BredellaMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-0440

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
CTSA Coordinating Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC)U24TR002260 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OSSIP, DEBORAH J, ZAND, MARTIN S · 2017 to 2021
$19.0M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002260NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of research networks and individual institutions to effectively and efficiently prepare, respond, and adapt to emergent challenges is essential for the biomedical research enterprise. At the beginning of 2021, a special Working Group was formed by individuals in the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium and approved by the CTSA Steering Committee to explore "Adaptive Capacity and Preparedness (AC&P) of CTSA Hubs." The AC&P Working Group took a pragmatic Environmental Scan (E-Scan) approach of utilizing the diverse data that had been collected through existing mechanisms. The Local Adaptive Capacity framework was adapted to illustrate the interconnectedness of CTSA programs and services, while exposing how the demands of the pandemic forced them to quickly pivot and adapt. This paper presents a synopsis of the themes and lessons learned that emerged from individual sections of the E-Scan. Lessons learned from this study may improve our understanding of adaptive capacity and preparedness at different levels, as well as help strengthen the core service models, strategies, and foster innovation in clinical and translational science research.

Indexed as

adaptive capacityClinical and translational researchClinical and Translational Science Award Programemergency preparednessenvironmental scan

Identifiers

PMID36845304
PMCPMC9947610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.