Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845294›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Genomic markers of recurrence risk in atypical meningioma following gross total resection.

Rachael A Vaubel, Rahul Kumar, Taylor M Weiskittel, Sarah Jenkins, Surendra Dasari, Joon H Uhm, Daniel H Lachance, Paul D Brown, Jamie J Van Gompel, Robert B Jenkins and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. H3 K27M mutation in rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors: a potential diagnostic pitfall.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael A VaubelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8842-5975
Rahul KumarDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Taylor M WeiskittelMolecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-0628
Sarah JenkinsDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Surendra DasariDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Joon H UhmDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Daniel H LachanceDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jamie J Van GompelDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-7870
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Benjamin R KippDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9477-0118
William R SukovDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-2194
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-6782
Derek R JohnsonDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Aditya RaghunathanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-7441
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults and CNS World Health Organization grade 2 (atypical) meningiomas show an intermediate risk of recurrence/progression. Molecular parameters are needed to better inform management following gross total resection (GTR). Methods: We performed comprehensive genomic analysis of tumor tissue from 63 patients who underwent radiologically confirmed GTR of a primary grade 2 meningioma, including a CLIA-certified target next-generation sequencing panel ( Results: The presence of specific copy number variants (CNVs), including -1p, -10q, -7p, and -4p, was the strongest predictor of decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) within our cohort ( Conclusions: CNVs are strong predictors of RFS in grade 2 meningiomas following GTR. Our study supports incorporation of CNV profiling into clinical evaluation to better guide postoperative patient management, which can be readily implemented using existing, clinically validated technologies.

Indexed as

atypical meningiomacopy numberDNA methylation profilinggross total resection

Identifiers

PMID36845294
PMCPMC9950854
OpenAlexW4313910096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.