ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2023
Research on steel rail surface defects detection based on improved YOLOv4 network.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A railway surface defect detection model based on topology-enhanced feature association.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A multi-scale adaptive framework for high-precision rail track damage detection via StarNet and bidirectional feature pyramid network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing surface defect detection with YOLOv9: the role of advanced backbone models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Editorial: Recent advances in image fusion and quality improvement for cyber-physical systems, volume II.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
- Strip steel surface defect detection based on lightweight YOLOv5.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The surface images of steel rails are extremely difficult to detect and recognize due to the presence of interference such as light changes and texture background clutter during the acquisition process. Methods: To improve the accuracy of railway defects detection, a deep learning algorithm is proposed to detect the rail defects. Aiming at the problems of inconspicuous rail defects edges, small size and background texture interference, the rail region extraction, improved Retinex image enhancement, background modeling difference, and threshold segmentation are performed sequentially to obtain the segmentation map of defects. For the classification of defects, Res2Net and CBAM attention mechanism are introduced to improve the receptive field and small target position weights. The bottom-up path enhancement structure is removed from the PANet structure to reduce the parameter redundancy and enhance the feature extraction of small targets. Results: The results show the average accuracy of rail defects detection reaches 92.68%, the recall rate reaches 92.33%, and the average detection time reaches an average of 0.068 s per image, which can meet the real-time of rail defects detection. Discussion: Comparing the improved method with the mainstream target detection algorithms such as Faster RCNN, SSD, YOLOv3 and other algorithms, the improved YOLOv4 has excellent comprehensive performance for rail defects detection, the improved YOLOv4 model obviously better than several others in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.