ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
Efficacy of Active Rapid Molecular Screening and IPC Interventions on Carbapenem-Resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Admission prognostic nutritional index improves risk stratification for the carbapenem-resistant phenotype in culture-positiveFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors of active carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae surveillance in hematology patients: a propensity score matching study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Active screening and molecular epidemiological characteristics of fecal colonization by carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Active Surveillance of Patients Colonized with CRE: A Single-Center Study Based on a Combined Molecular/Culture Protocol.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether rapid active molecular screening and infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions can reduce colonization or infection with carbapenem-resistant Methods: The study was designed as a before-and-after quasi-experiment. Before the experimental period, the ward was rescheduled and the staff were trained. From May 2018 to April 2021, active screening was performed by seminested real-time fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection with rectal swabs from all patients on admission to the EICU, and the results were reported in 1 hour. Other IPC interventions including hand hygiene, contact precautions, patient isolation, environmental disinfection, environment surveillance, monitoring, auditing and feedback were conducted under strict supervision. The patients' clinical characteristics were collected simultaneously. Results: In this 3-year study, 630 patients were enrolled and 19.84% of the patients were initially colonized or infected with CRE as shown by active molecular screening. The average drug resistance ratio to carbapenem shown by clinical culture detection of Conclusion: Active rapid molecular screening and other IPC interventions may significantly reduce CRE nosocomial infections even in wards without enough single-room isolation. The key to reduce the spread of CRE in the EICU is the strict execution of IPC interventions by all medical staff and healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.