Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844962›Full record

ReviewRomanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care2022

Narrative Review on Perioperative Shivering during Caesarean Section under Neuraxial Anaesthesia.

Kamal Kumar, Cheng Lin, Tammy Symons, Craig Railton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamal KumarDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Cheng LinDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Tammy SymonsDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Craig RailtonDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative shivering is a well-known complication reported in 29 to 54% of patients undergoing a caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. It interferes with pulse oximetry, blood pressure (BP), and electrocardiographic monitoring (ECG). Moreover, it gives the patient a distressing and unpleasant experience. This review aims to examine the mechanism of shivering during the caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia and to explore available information for preventing and managing this clinically significant complication. A literature search of PubMed, MedLine, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was done. The search results were limited to randomised controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews. This review studied the efficacy of various nonpharmacological and pharmacological methods to manage perioperative shivering. We found that pre-warming and intraoperative warming are simple and effective interventions, although the effect seems to depend on the duration of treatment. Multiple pharmacological interventions, including opioids, NMDA receptor antagonists, and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, have been studied and found to reduce the incidence and severity of perioperative shivering during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionNeuraxial anaesthesiaperioperative shivering

Identifiers

PMID36844962
PMCPMC9949012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.